Functional
Performance Analysis of Ball Milling
Excerpts from:
Industrial Validation of the Functional Performance Equation for Ball
Milling: A Breakthrough Tool for Improving Plant Grinding Performance,
to be presented by Robert E. McIvor, Chief Engineer, Grinding Systems,
to the 2005 Canadian Mineral Processor’s Conference in Ottawa, Canada,
and the 2005 Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, Inc. Conference
in Salt Lake City, USA.
Abstract: The Functional Performance Equation for Ball
Milling was first presented in 1988. It has now been used successfully
in more than a dozen mineral processing plants. This powerful, yet simple
tool provides a new level of understanding of closed circuit grinding.
It shows how grinding circuit efficiency is in reality comprised of two
distinct and active efficiencies. It demonstrates how circuit production
rate is related, collectively, to these two efficiencies, mill energy
input, and the grindability of the ore. It provides the means to link
circuit performance to plant design and operating variables that can be
manipulated, and thus creates an effective strategy for making circuit
improvements. This paper covers the derivation and industrial validation
of this equation. As part of an engineering and management system that
also incorporates suitable measurements and control, other operators can
now use this tool to manage the processing performance of their grinding
operations with clarity and confidence.
Summary Derivation: Ball mill circuit “classification
system efficiency” (or “CSEff”) is defined as the percentage
of “coarse” material, versus “fines” in the ball
mill. The “effective mill power” (or “EMP”) is
the percentage of total mill power (“TMP”) delivered to the
“coarse” ore.
| Eq.1 |
EMP = TMP
x CSEff |
| The
production rate of “fines” or new product (“PRNP”)
by the circuit equals the specific grinding rate of “coarse”
material (“SGRC”) per unit of energy applied to it.
|
| Eq.2 |
PRNP = EMP x SGRC |
| Substituting: |
| Eq.3 |
PRNP = TMP x CSEff x
SGRC |
| Next,
divide and multiply the last term of Equation 3 by the lab grindability. |
| Eq.4 |
PRNP = TMP x CSEff x
SGRC/LabGr x LabGr |
| The
ratio of the plant ball mill grinding rate to the lab mill grinding
rate is the relative “ball mill grinding efficiency”(or
BMGEff “). |
| Eq.5 |
SGRC/LabGr = BMGEff
|
| Substituting
yields the Functional Performance Equation: |
| Eq.6 |
PRNP = TMP x CSEff x
LabGr x BMGEff |
The Functional Performance Equation therefore reads as follows:
Production
Rate
of New Product
|
= |
Total
Mill
Power Draw |
X |
Classification
System Efficiency |
X |
Material
Grindability |
X |
Mill
Grinding Efficiency |
Each of these
is measured during an initial circuit audit. Circuit efficiencies are
benchmarked, and changes then made to circuit design and/or operating
variables to increase either or both efficiencies. Follow up surveys verify
improvements. The full paper text provides a number of industrial plant
examples.
Contact
Us about applying Functional Performance Analysis at your
operation.
|